Results of Agency Self-Assessment

Fall 2003

 

Agency:  Washington State School for the Blind

Director:  Dr. Dean Stenehjem

Internal Quality Consultant:  Cherie Willhide, SPHR

 

Process used to complete the self-assessment (who was involved, how scores were determined)
We have continued to use the same process that we have used since beginning the Agency Self Assessment several years ago.  All administrators and Supervisors are asked to complete the self-assessment and submit for compilation and analysis

Strengths – three areas (at the ITEM level) in which the agency is doing well.

1.  Leadership

2.  Customer Focus

3.  Strategic Planning.

Opportunities - one to three areas (at the ITEM level) in which the agency plans to focus its internal organizational improvement efforts in the coming year.

1.  Employee Recognition.  This area is really important when fewer staff are being asked to do more with less.

2.  Accountability.  Developing better methods to track trends and demonstrate successes.

3.  Partnerships.  Continued expansion of partnerships.

 

Anything you want to add? (comments on the tool, lessons learned, observations on the process)
Once again the school will be taking a giant step in moving into new areas of program development (i.e, Distance learning).  It will be important to move forward in this area and bring all staff along in the process.

 

Scoresheet attach 2003 Self-Assessment Scoresheet with item and overall category scores.

 

Submitted by: __________________________________Date:_____________

 

By September 15, 2003, send to:

Mary Campbell, Special Assistant for Quality and Performance

Office of the Governor, PO Box 4-0002, Olympia WA 98504-0002


Washington State Self-Assessment Score Sheet – 2003

 

CATEGORY

ITEM

SCORE

 

 

LEADERSHIP

Senior Leadership Direction

 

Innovative Work Environment

 

Organizational Performance Review

 

Public Responsibility and Citizenship

 

Overall Leadership Category Score

6.0

 

 

 

 

STRATEGIC

PLANNING

Strategy Development Process

 

Plan Development

 

Plan Deployment

 

Performance Targets

 

Overall Strategic Planning Category Score

5.75

 

 

 

 

CUSTOMER

FOCUS

Customer and Industry Knowledge

 

Customer Requirements

 

Customer Relationships

 

Customer Satisfaction

 

Overall Customer Focus Category Score

6.0

 

 

 

 

INFORMATION

AND ANALYSIS

Data Quality

 

Measurement of Organizational Performance

 

Use of Information for Improvement

 

Communication of Organizational Performance

 

Overall Information and Analysis Category Score

5.4

 

 

 

 

HUMAN

RESOURCE

FOCUS

Work Systems

 

Employee Training and Development

 

Employee Well Being

 

Employee Satisfaction and Recognition

 

Accountability

 

Overall Human Resource Focus Category Score

5.1

 

 

 

 

PROCESS

MANAGEMENT

Process Design

 

Process Performance

 

Support Processes

 

Supplier and Partner Processes

 

Overall Process Management Category Score

5.5

 

 

 

 

 

PERFORMANCE

RESULTS

Customer Focused Results

 

Financial Results

 

Human Resource Results

 

Internal Business Process Results

 

Public Value and Benefit Results

 

Overall Performance Results  Category Score

5.75

SCORING:  1 - Not engaged yet, 2 - Beginning to engage, 3 - Minimum standards met, 4 - Practitioners with moderate success, 5 - Stable processes with trend results, 6 - Sustained results, role model, 7 - World class excellence. Decimals acceptable.